The Politics, Promises, and Perils of Data: Evidence-Driven Policy and Practice for Menstrual Health

Inga T. Winkler, Chris Bobel, Lauren C. Houghton, Noémie Elhadad, Caitlin Gruer & Vanessa Paranjothy
Wednesday, October 14, 2020

Data determine what we know about the menstrual cycle; they inform policy and program decisions; they can point us to neglected issues and populations. But collecting and analyzing data are complicated and often fraught processes, because data are political and subjective, decisions on what data we collect and what data we do not collect are not determined by accident. As a result, despite the significant potential of the current rise in attention to menstruation, there are also risks, including:

  • a lack of a solid evidence base for program decisions and resulting sensationalization;
  • concerns about data privacy;
  • an overreliance on participants’ recall;
  • not involving participants adequately in decision making; and
  • a lack of contextualized and disaggregated data.
In her recent paper, Professor Winkler is joined in a conversation by other members of the interdisciplinary Working Group on Menstrual Health and Gender Justice to discuss the promises and perils of data about menstruation. The paper is based on a plenary panel held at the biennial conference of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research in Colorado Springs in June 2019. The authors argue that better communication, contextualization, and collaboration can address many of these risks.
The full paper can be accessed here:
Inga T. Winkler, Chris Bobel, Lauren C. Houghton, Noémie Elhadad, Caitlin Gruer & Vanessa Paranjothy (2020) The Politics, Promises, and Perils of Data: Evidence-Driven Policy and Practice for Menstrual Health, Women's Reproductive Health, DOI: 10.1080/23293691.2020.1820240