Josephine Koch

Columbia University School of General Studies , Undergraduate
"Questioning the 'Collective Good': Techno-Solutionism, Congolese Cobalt, and the Invisibilization of Sacrifice"
AbstractWithin the discourse on climate change, there is often a perceived binary between the problem before us and the solution(s) at hand. These solutions—developing renewable energy, investing in electric vehicles, and even building entire new hyper-modern “green” cities—often fit into a techno-determinist, techno-solutionist narrative that glosses over the complex set of compromises (moral, political, economic) that they pose. The development of electric vehicles has been central to this narrative, with countless technocrats, policymakers, and businesspeople heralding advances in EV technology as a game changer in the fight against climate change. However, less discussed is the catastrophic effect that EV technology—specifically the mining of elements such as cobalt that are essential components of lithium batteries—has upon marginalized communities. Using the case study of cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), this paper will seek to challenge the techno-solutionist narrative as articulated by entities like The Breakthrough Institute and key texts like “The Techno-Optimist Manifesto,” which hold that climate change will be addressed through technology, innovation, and the innate human capacity for progress. In place of this, I will argue that the case of cobalt mining in the DRC poses an undeniable challenge to the triumphalist narrative that portrays EV development as a central pillar of the “solution” to climate change. As examinations of the interrelation between techno-solutionism, capitalism, and (neo)colonialism reveal, techno-solutionism’s reassurance that technological responses to climate change need not entail sacrifices is blatantly incongruent with the stark reality of the systemic sacrifice of certain racially and geographically defined populations for the sake of the “collective.” This “collective,” while defined by techno-solutionism as universal, is predicated on the erasure, exclusion, and legitimization of “collateral damage” in the postcolonial Global South. As the case study of cobalt mining in the Congo reveals, technological “solutions” to climate change do not come without costs. By erasing these costs, which, like the effects of climate change itself, are disproportionately born by Black and Brown populations in the Global South, techno-solutionism represents an insidious narrative that obscures, trivializes, and justifies the mass sacrifice of entire populations along colonial and racial lines. In so doing, techno-solutionism becomes the rhetorical embodiment of necropolitics, serving as a tool by which to delineate colonially and racially defined boundaries that divide the supposedly “universal” collective of beneficiaries from the “expendables” who are to be sacrificed for the “greater good.”