Dancing for Human Rights: Engaging Labor Rights and Social Remembrance in Poor Mouth

TitleDancing for Human Rights: Engaging Labor Rights and Social Remembrance in Poor Mouth
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsEric C.1 Mullis
JournalDance Research
Volume34
Issue2
Pagination220-242
ISSN02642875
Abstract

There is a tradition of dance artists developing work for the concert stage in order to engage pressing social justice issues and, more specifically, the abuse of human rights. Anna Sokolow’s Strange American Funeral (1935), Pearl Primus’ Strange Fruit (1945), Katherine Dunham’s Southland (1951), Alvin Ailey’s Masekela Langage (1969), JawoleWilla Jo Zollar’s Womb Wars (1992), William Forsythe’s Human Writes (2005), and Douglas Wright’s Black Milk (2006) are examples of acclaimed dances that address the manner in which marginalized individuals and social groups have not been granted equal ethical or political consideration.1 In this essay I consider how dance enacts secular rituals of remembrance for victims of human rights abuses characteristic of a particular community’s or nation’s historical legacy. This entails discussion of aesthetic strategies used to portray human rights abuse, a consideration of the ethics of memory, and analysis of specific dance work. I discuss my site-adaptive work Poor Mouth (2013) which centers on labor rights issues in the American South during the Great Depression and I argue that dance which presents such issues performs a valuable social function as it encourages audiences to remember the past in a manner that facilitates a historically informed understanding of communal identity. Further, since historical instances of human rights abuse often have contemporary correlates and since remembrance affects the significance of places associated with the history in question, the implications of such work temporally and spatially extend beyond the performance venue and thereby contribute to political discourse in the public sphere. Dance intersects with human rights issues in many ways, but here I focus on dances intended for performance on the concert stage. For the purposes of this essay, the terms ‘dance activism’ and ‘political dance’ refer to dances that intentionally grapple with explicit human rights abuses and that are intended to be performed for a theatre-going audience. Along the way I note what bearing my points have for other forms such as popular dance, dance used in acts of public political protest, site-specific dance, and dance therapy, but I should emphasize that it is beyond the scope of this essay to consider the many ways that dance intersects with human rights and with political activism more generally. Lastly, I should say that my approach to this topic is informed by the personal experience of collaboratively creating and performing dance work in a particular community and that it is interdisciplinary in nature since its draw on aspects of philosophical ethics in order to reflect on that experience.

DOI10.3366/drs.2016.0160
Short TitleDancing for Human Rights