| Abstract | Is (or are) memory studies, social or otherwise, a field? If so, does anything hold it together beyond the mere use of the phrase "collective memory"? Memory studies is simultaneously still in its charismatic phase, though it no longer has a right to be, as well as highly resistant to efforts to escape from it, though it clearly needs to do so. To be a field, it needs a memory of its own. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
|
| Notes | 'Accession Number: 41041946; Olick, Jeffrey 1; Email Address: jko3k@virginia.edu; Affiliations: 1 : Sociology Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22904 USA; Source Info: 2009, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p249; Thesaurus Term: COLLECTIVE memory; Thesaurus Term: MEMORY; Thesaurus Term: PSYCHOLOGY; Thesaurus Term: SOCIAL sciences; Subject Term: RESEARCH; Subject Term: SOCIAL sciences & psychology; Subject Term: DIVERSITY in education; Author-Supplied Keyword: Canon; Author-Supplied Keyword: Collective memory; Author-Supplied Keyword: Field; Author-Supplied Keyword: Social memory studies; Number of Pages: 4p. Document Type: Article'
'Copyright of International Journal of Politics, Culture & Society is the property of Springer Science & Business Media B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder\'s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)'
|
